01 / Ecommerce Profitability & Growth

Know where your growth creates contribution before funding more of it.

A bounded analysis of one consequential commercial decision: establish the relevant growth economics, compare realistic scenarios and make a recommendation.

Fit & trigger

For a real growth decision—not general ecommerce reporting.

Who this is for
A founder-led Shopify business, initially around €3m–€10m revenue, with meaningful paid acquisition and repeat-purchase economics. This range is an initial fit hypothesis, not a proven ideal-customer profile.
Decision owner
The founder or finance/growth owner who can act on the recommendation.
When it becomes relevant
You are deciding whether to increase or reduce acquisition spend, change channel mix, alter pricing or promotions, or shift product emphasis.
The decision
Which realistic growth choice creates enough contribution to justify the capital and risk?
What Apex Arc does

Turn the commercial question into a decision model.

The scope is one Shopify-led business, one consequential decision, one agreed historical period and only the analytical cuts relevant to that decision.

01

Contribution / Growth Economics Model

Decision-relevant contribution economics, including supported acquisition and repeat-purchase effects.

02

Decision Scenarios

A bounded set of realistic alternatives, assumptions and economic sensitivities.

03

Decision Brief

Recommendation, rationale, critical assumptions, main uncertainty and what to measure next.

04

Live Readout

One decision session with the named owner, followed by one proposal-limited revision if needed.

How it works

Scope and evidence first.

  1. ConfirmFix the central question, decision owner and bounded scope.
  2. Check readinessTest whether the available data can support the question.
  3. Model choicesEstablish contribution economics and compare scenarios.
  4. RecommendDeliver the brief and live decision readout.
Inputs & readiness

Evidence must be usable.

Depending on the question: Shopify/order data, product costs, refunds and returns, relevant fulfilment and payment costs, acquisition spend, and customer or cohort evidence. Read-only access or usable exports are expected.

If inputs are incomplete but answerable, the question or claim is narrowed. If they are fundamentally unusable, the work pauses or is declined; unlimited data cleaning is not absorbed into scope.

Timeline

Fixed after readiness.

The proposal fixes the data/input deadline, scope, readout date and revision limit after the readiness check. No generic delivery duration is promised before that check.

Boundaries

Not included.

  • Ad management or campaign execution
  • Shopify or store operations
  • Recurring dashboard or reporting systems
  • Production implementation
  • Guaranteed uplift or profit
  • Unlimited revisions or materially different questions
Price

€3,500 fixed fee

For the first two lighthouse clients.

The fee covers the proposal-defined question, inputs, deliverables, readout and revision boundary. A materially new question requires rescoping.

Illustrative example

Sample output structure.

The structure below is illustrative only. It contains no client data and does not represent client results.

Illustrative example / No client data
01 / Contribution scenarios

Establish the baseline.
Compare the economic implication.

Baseline / Reference

Hold

Maintain current mix

Contribution view
Baseline case
Critical uncertainty
Repeat-purchase window
Alternative / Compare

Reallocate

Shift channel mix

Contribution view
Low / base / high
Critical uncertainty
Incremental acquisition quality
Alternative / Compare

Promotion change

Alter offer depth

Contribution view
Low / base / high
Critical uncertainty
Margin and cohort response

Decision lens Which growth choice justifies the capital and risk? This sample shows the structure, not a recommendation.

One consequential question

What growth decision is waiting on better economics?