2–3 hour workshop
A presentation-led session with a live demonstration, applied exercise and Q&A.
Give a team a shared way to define the work, provide context, evaluate output and decide where human review belongs—without turning the session into an implementation project.
Workshop engagement€2,500 fixed fee2–3 hour live session / One team or department
FormatA reusable method.
Light tailoring and bounded follow-up.
A presentation-led session with a live demonstration, applied exercise and Q&A.
A reusable reference deck, workflow design template and evaluation/QA checklist.
One or two worked examples that teach the method without becoming department implementations.
Align the audience, constraints, objectives and representative recurring work.
Select and prepare teaching examples within the proposal-defined customization boundary.
One first-use Q&A or review in the agreed format.
Participants learn to treat AI use as workflow design, not ad hoc prompting.
The sponsor provides a brief, representative recurring tasks or sanitized materials, relevant AI/tool/policy constraints and the participant group. Any required tool access or permissions need to be resolved before the session.
If safe examples or permissions are unavailable by the input deadline, the demonstration is narrowed or the session pauses.
The core session lasts 2–3 hours. The proposal fixes the session date, input deadline, participant count, selected examples and follow-up format after scoping.
One presentation-led workshop for one team or department.
Apex Arc teaches the method; it does not implement your department's workflows as part of the Workshop.
Illustrative teaching material only—not a bespoke department workflow or evidence of client results.
What must the model know, and what useful result is required?
QA check Is the task bounded and appropriate for AI?
What source material is authoritative, and what operation is requested?
QA check Can claims be traced to supplied evidence?
What form should the result take, and what makes it acceptable?
QA check Are accuracy, completeness and risk checked?
Who reviews, escalates and remains accountable?
QA check Is a qualified human making the final judgement?
Accountability stays with people A reusable teaching reference, not a bespoke department workflow.